「情感教主」Ayawawa荼毒姑娘的言論簡直刷新三觀！被封大快人心！

昨天，情感類博主@Ayawawa微博被禁言，讓大家拍手稱快，大呼過癮。

據@微博管理員5月22日消息，微博用戶@Ayawawa 在線下某活動中發表有關慰安婦的嚴重不當言論，現決定對其帳號禁言禁被關注6個月。

Chinese social media platform Sina Weibo said Tuesday that an online celebrity"s Weibo account has been banned from publishing posts for six months, following her recent inappropriate comments on "comfort women."

In an offline activity, the owner of the account, ayawawa, inappropriately referred to "comfort women" - who were forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese army during World War II - which sparked public criticism, Sina Weibo said in a post.

Though the account owner did not publish the remarks on the Weibo account, the account has caused serious social adverse effects, and Sina Weibo decided to ban it from publishing posts and being followed for six months.

可能這件事發生前，你還沒聽說過她的名字。

現在，我們已經看不到她微博上的內容，但還能看到她的」頭銜」：

（@Ayawawa微博簡介）

Ayawawa（本名楊冰陽），是「暢銷書作家」、「情感作家」，「百萬粉絲微博博主」、「百萬粉絲微信公眾號主」。除此之外，她還是「初代網紅」、被許多人封為「情感教主」。

我們暫且不說她怎麼成為了網紅，先來看她是怎麼一下子就惹毛了群眾、「全民喊打」的。

事情是這樣的：

前不久，騰訊公益旗下的公眾號「穀雨實驗室」發布了一篇名為《情感教主Ayawawa和300萬種擇偶焦慮》的文章，迅速在網上流傳。

文章中寫到，在一堂「女性情感培訓課」上，作為主講人的Ayawawa讓女孩們想像日軍侵華時期的慰安婦制度受害者。

她說，同時期的男人更慘，都被打死了，女人至少還能留下一條命。並還聲稱，「所以你看，就算遇到戰爭，女生還是有性別優勢的」，「只要你發揮好自己的優勢，各種好處就會源源不斷。」

（「穀雨實驗室」《情感教主Ayawawa和300萬種擇偶焦慮》文章截圖）

Yang Bingyang 楊冰陽, or Ayawawa, is a Chinese relationship expert who created a lucrative business by preaching her questionable yet popular dating theories to a legion of about 3 million fans. Guyu Lab, an online media outlet operated by Tencent, published a widely circulated article (in Chinese) profiling the self-acclaimed 「goddess of dating」 and her loyal followers, and one quote by Yang in the article has drawn fire on the Chinese internet.

During an emotional training course for women, Yang said that women could use their gender advantages, such as a beautiful appearance and gentle personality, to gain men"s love and financial support instead of working themselves. She said that females during wars have more chances than males to survive because of their gender advantages, saying the "comfort women" survived the war in this way.

「Do you think they are really miserable? Have you thought of men during that period of time? Many of them got killed during the war, but women managed to survive,」 Yang said. 「So you see, girls still have gender advantages during wartime. As long as you can exploit the advantages based on your gender, the benefits are beyond measure.」

此外，據《中國日報》報導，早在5月18日，@Ayawawa微博也曾發過一條類似微博，裡面有這樣一段話：

「日軍屠城的時候，燒殺搶掠，男性一定逃不過厄運，一個坑埋掉上千人。而女性雖然被強暴，但她們還有機會存活下來，見證歷史，告訴我們那些過去的事情……」

（這篇微博已被Ayawawa刪除）

這是怎樣荒唐可笑，毫不尊重歷史、且殘忍到毫無良知的邏輯？讓人看完真是後背發涼，氣不打一處來！

就在「穀雨實驗室」的文章發出後，Ayawawa發布了一條微博道歉稱：

「我長期運營情感類自媒體，涉及軍事政治的內容知之甚少，才會發生這種低級錯誤。」並表示，「為了能夠真正重塑認識，自今日起本人帳號停更一個月。」但之後此微博也被刪除。

Yang apologized (in Chinese) on Weibo for what she called 「an inexcusable mistake」 that she made while commenting on 「the gender difference during wartime.」「I was not aware that all human beings are victims of wars, regardless of gender,」 she wrote. 「I』ve been blogging about relationships for a long time and I knew little about politics and military affairs. That』s why I made such a stupid mistake.」 Yang also announced that she will take a break from all social media platforms for a month to 「learn internet regulations, conduct self-criticism, and foster correct worldviews.」

但光道歉就完了嗎？

「毫無下限」的劇毒雞湯，讓Ayawawa遭到了網友和各大媒體的集體抨擊。

網友大呼，這種人應該趕緊被封號：

The apology, however, did not go down well with angry netizens who wanted Yang to be muted on all sorts of platforms for good. 「One month is far from enough. She』s been objectifying women for such a long time. Why is she still around?」 one Weibo user wrote (in Chinese).

「中青評論」公眾號評論稱，拿慰安婦制度受害者作為所謂「培訓課」的授課材料，為自己「性別優勢」的歪理邪說辯護，顯然不是Ayawawa脫口而出的無心之失。Ayawawa不知道或者故意裝傻的是，慰安婦制度受害者不僅在肉體上承受了巨大的傷害，那些僥倖生存下來的人，還在今後幾十年生命中，無時不刻地承受著精神痛苦。這種痛苦是生活在和平時期的人們無法理解的，也不能機械地與抗戰中犧牲、被殺害的中國軍民相比較。

《中國婦女報》也對Ayawawa的言論表達了不滿：「如果不是看了Ayawawa的文章，真想像不到朗朗乾坤下還有如此陰沉灰暗的教唆，男女平等國策下還有把女性往塵埃裡踩踏的課程，情感教主Ayawawa操持的真是歪理邪說、有毒雞湯。」

The head-scratching article has ignited a storm of criticism online, with many newspapers, such as the China Youth Daily and China Women Newspaper, castigating the values advocated by Yang. 「Because of this article, we are reminded that even in a country where gender equality is a basic national policy, there are toxic theories like this and lessons that try to degrade women into dust,」 China Women Newspaper wrote (in Chinese).

共青團中央也轉發了這條評論：

《人民日報》官博也發布了消息並評論：

「微博@Ayawawa被處理，大快人心。一個熱衷於販賣陳腐價值觀的帳號，一個為了收割流量多次「擦槍走火」的行銷者，早就犯了眾怒，也誤導毒害了不少盲從者。該反思的是，這類「教主」為何不乏鐵粉？三觀不正，就該糾偏；謬種流傳，必須遏製。」

其實，Ayawawa「妖言惑眾」可不只這一次，只是這一次竟敢歪曲歷史、侮辱慰安婦，實在讓人無法再忽視。

網友早先就扒出來，Ayawawa經常有這樣的「女性情感聖經」：

「老公出軌是因為女人的條件不如老公，高攀了他。」

「女人在二十幾歲事業比男人好，是因為利用了性別優勢，並不代表能力強。」

「女人要表現出溫柔嘴甜，善於崇拜等等，男人才會信任你，進而對你投資，滿足你的要求。」

（圖為知乎問答截圖）

對於美國大選上希拉裡敗給了川普，Ayawawa也有「獨到見解」，她說：

「她的失敗不是女性的失敗，是因為她自己不夠優秀，她沒有資格代表全體女性失敗。信不信伊萬卡來參選，分分鐘pk掉自己老爹好嗎？」

Aside from this extremely questionable take on the plight of comfort women, the article is basically a stream of arguments on why women should never overestimate their value in the dating market and how to take advantage of their gender to please men and find a successful partner. 「Dress yourself to look good. Be a young mother. Don』t marry someone out of your league,」 Yang advises. On the topic of Hillary Clinton』s election failure, Yang says, 「Her loss to Donald Trump doesn』t suggest a failure of women as a whole. She lost because she』s not good enough. If Ivanka Trump were in the race, her father would have lost to her easily.」

今年四月，《透明人》節目也曾影片採訪過Ayawawa，在這場時長13分鐘的「尬聊」採訪期間，Ayawawa頻頻爆出「金句」，不停刷新著觀眾的三觀。

由於她的「洗腦」觀點實在扭曲到不成人形，在這裡世紀君就不列舉這樣的反面教材了。

總結歸納一下，大概就是：女性好好學習好好工作乾嘛？只要改造性格，學會怎麼打扮自己、討好男性，就能獲得「幸福人生」了……

（Ayawawa：「我不建議她們穿波西米亞風的東西」……）

可就是這樣的「教材」，卻真的洗腦了很多姑娘。

（圖片來自《透明人》影片採訪）

網紅Ayawawa在女性中的影響力甚至也引起了外媒的關注。去年，《紐約時報》曾發過一篇標題為《中國女性結婚壓力大，網上情感顧問受追捧》的文章：

文中寫到，「尋找合適伴侶的壓力催生了高收視率的電視相親節目和公開相親活動。還有像Ayawawa這樣的情感顧問專欄作家，傳授和男人約會以及結婚的技巧。」

「The stress surrounding the search for a suitable partner has given rise to highly rated television dating shows and public matchmaking events. And to advice columnists like Ayawawa, who can detail the techniques for dating and marrying a man.」

然而真如文中所說，光講解約會技巧就能給人「洗腦」了嗎？

其實原因在於，相比很多情感專欄作家，Ayawawa是用一些基於所謂「專業理論體系」的公式和套路，支撐自己的觀點。

《紐約時報》此文中還寫到，「Ayawawa在她的微信公眾號上說，「M.V.」代表的是「婚戀市場價值」，而「P.U.」是指「親子不確定性」。」

As Ayawawa explains on her WeChat home page, 「M.V.」 stands for 「Mate Value,」 and 「P.U.」 refers to 「Paternity Uncertainty.」

「她進行了說明：』一個男人的M.V.的衡量標準主要有8項：年齡、身高、長相、財富、智商、情商、性能力和長期承諾。與男人標準相對應，衡量一個女人的M.V.的8項標準為：年齡、長相、身高、罩杯、體重、學歷、性格、家庭環境。』」

She elaborated: 「A man』s M.V. is determined by his age, height, looks, wealth, I.Q., emotional quotient, sexual capacity and willingness to make a long-term commitment.」 The eight elements in a woman』s M.V. are her 「age, looks, height, bra cup size, weight, academic degrees, personality and family background.」

「對於P.U.，Ayawawa說：』在整個人類進化歷史中，男性一直面臨著父親身份不確定的問題。」所以她建議她的女性讀者：「平時要注意不要穿太暴露的衣服。不要總發喝酒照片。行為要淑女，說話要溫聲，要矜持。」

As for P.U., Ayawawa said, 「In human evolutionary history, a man』s great concern is that he cannot be certain if he is the father of his partner』s child.」 So she advises her female readers: 「Don』t wear revealing clothes. Don』t be always posting pictures of yourself drinking in a bar. Be a lady, speak softly, be modest.」